Ludwik Silberstein

Ludwik Silberstein (1872 – 1948) was a Polish-American physicist who helped make special relativity and general relativity staples of university coursework. His textbook The Theory of Relativity was published by Macmillan & Co Ltd in 1914 with a second edition, expanded to include general relativity, in 1924.

Silberstein was born May 17, 1872 in Warsaw to Samuel Silberstein and Emily Steinkalk. He was educated in Cracow, Heidelberg, and Berlin. To teach he went to Bologna, Italy from 1899 to 1904, switching then to the University of Rome until 1920. That year he entered private research for the Eastman Kodak Company of Rochester, New York. For nine years he maintained this consultancy with Kodak labs while he gave his relativity course on occasion at the University of Chicago, the University of Toronto, and Cornell University.He lived until January 17, 1948[1].

Contents

Textbook inaugurating relativity science

At the International Congress of Mathematicians in 1912 at Cambridge, Silberstein spoke on "Some applications of quaternions". The text was not published in the proceedings of the congress, but rather was placed in the Philosophical Magazine of May, 1912, with the title "Quaternionic form of relativity"[2]. The following year Macmillan & Co Ltd published The Theory of Relativity, which is now available on-line in the Internet Archive (see references). The quaternions used are actually biquaternions. The book is highly readable and well-referenced with contemporary sources in the footnotes.

The Einstein-Silberstein debate

In 1935, following a controversial debate[3] with Einstein, Silberstein published a solution[4] of Einstein's field equations that appeared to describe a static, axisymmetric metric with only two point singularities representing two point masses. Such a solution clearly violates our understanding of gravity: with nothing to support them and no kinetic energy to hold them apart, the two masses should fall towards each other due to their mutual gravity, in contrast with the static nature of Silberstein's solution. This led Silberstein to claim that Einstein's theory was flawed, in need of a revision. In response, Einstein and Rosen published a Letter[5] to the Editor in which they pointed out a critical flaw in Silberstein's reasoning. Unconvinced, Silberstein took the debate to the popular press, with The Evening Telegram in Toronto publishing an article titled "Fatal blow to relativity issued here" on March 7, 1936[6]. Nonetheless, Einstein was correct and Silberstein was wrong: as we know today, all solutions to Weyl's family of axisymmetric metrics, of which Silberstein's is one example, necessarily contain singular structures ("struts", "ropes", or "membranes") that are responsible for holding masses against the attractive force of gravity in a static configuration[7].

Other contributions

According to Martin Claussen[8], Ludwik Silberstein initiated a line of thought involving eddy currents in the atmosphere, or fluids generally. He says that Silberstein anticipated foundational work by Vilhelm Bjerknes (1862 – 1951).

Other works

References

  1. ^ Allen G. Debus, "Ludwik Silberstein", Who's Who in Science, 1968.
  2. ^ Ludwik Silberstein, Quaternionic form of relativity, Philosophical Magazine 23:790-809.
  3. ^ P. Havas, The General-Relativistic Two-Body Problem and the Einstein-Silberstein Controversy, in The Attraction of Gravitation. Birkhäuser. 2003. ISBN 9780817636241. http://books.google.com/?id=mCOtbqBPNhQC. 
  4. ^ Ludwik Silberstein (February 1, 1936). "Two-Centers Solution of the Gravitational Field Equations, and the Need for a Reformed Theory of Matter" (subscription required). Physical Review 49: 268–270. Bibcode 1936PhRv...49..268S. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.49.268. http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.49.268 
  5. ^ A. Einstein and N. Rosen (February 17, 1936). "Two-Body Problem in General Relativity" (subscription required). Physical Review 49: 404–405. Bibcode 1936PhRv...49..404E. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.49.404.2. http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.49.404.2 
  6. ^ "Einstein Archives Online Nr. [15-258.10"]. http://www.alberteinstein.info/db/ViewDetails.do?DocumentID=30857. 
  7. ^ Hans Stephani et al. (2003). Exact Solutions to Einstein's Field Equations Second Edition. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-46136-7. 
  8. ^ Martin Claussen, Bericht uber die 4. FAGEM Tagung, S. 16 .